Wednesday, July 23

By the time the ambulance arrived, it was too late.

That’s how the grandmother of 67-year-old Miguel Alvarez began her story. He’d collapsed walking two blocks from his apartment to the bus stop—113 degrees outside. No shade. No breeze. No water. Just heat and silence. Miguel was the third heat-related fatality in that Phoenix neighborhood in a single week.

Now, I’ve seen a lot in my career—coastal towns rebuilding after hurricanes, Indigenous communities fighting for broadband, schools rising from shipping containers. But this? This was different. Because it wasn’t a disaster you could see coming. It was one that kept coming—every summer, hotter, longer, deadlier.

Phoenix was becoming a furnace. And for low-income families, the elderly, and the unhoused, there was nowhere to hide.

But as always—where there’s pain, there’s possibility. And where there’s possibility, there’s a grant just waiting for a story strong enough to unlock it.

That’s where I came in.

Setting the Scene

Phoenix, Arizona. The fifth-largest city in the U.S. and, increasingly, the hottest. With 55+ days over 110°F in a single summer and nighttime lows that barely dip below 90, the city had entered what climate scientists called “permanent heat emergency mode.”

And yet, for all its modern skyline and tech growth, Phoenix had gaps where the heat hit hardest: neighborhoods where trees were scarce, buildings lacked insulation, and air conditioning was a luxury not a guarantee.

Worse still, the city’s few designated cooling centers were too far apart, open inconsistent hours, and often lacked culturally competent services. For the unhoused, seniors, or single mothers without cars—access was nearly impossible.

In short, Phoenix was roasting the wrong people first.

But the moment was ripe. The Inflation Reduction Act, the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, and a wave of new state resilience funds had created a once-in-a-generation window to redesign urban climate response. What Phoenix needed was a catalyst—someone to turn a good idea into a bulletproof funding narrative.

So I packed my linen suits and landed in the desert.

The Visionaries

The spark started with Khalilah Moreno, a public health nurse turned neighborhood advocate. After a record 425 heat-related deaths in 2023, she rallied a coalition of churches, schools, and nonprofits under one banner: Phoenix Oasis.

Their vision? A network of permanent, solar-powered community cooling centers embedded directly in the most heat-burdened areas of the city. Not just pop-ups in crises—but permanent, multipurpose spaces that could operate year-round as community hubs and transform during extreme heat days into life-saving sanctuaries.

These wouldn’t be generic shelters. Each one would include:

• Passive cooling architecture (think adobe-style insulation and white roofs)

• Solar + battery storage for blackout resilience

• Hydration stations and misting areas

• Health and social services access

• Trained community climate stewards from within the neighborhoods

The partners were as diverse as the project was bold—ASU’s School of Sustainability, a tribal-led solar installation firm, neighborhood youth groups, and local housing authorities.

They had urgency. They had data. They had buy-in. But they didn’t have the $9.2 million needed to launch Phase One.

And so—my phone rang.

Enter Mr. Grant Money

I met Khalilah at a sidewalk vigil where community members were placing candles for heat victims outside a shuttered pharmacy. “We’ve buried too many,” she said. “We’ve got blueprints, partnerships, and political backing. But we need the funding playbook.”

She came to the right man.

First, I did what I always do: audited the opportunity. The project hit multiple themes that made funders salivate:

• Climate adaptation

• Health equity

• Renewable energy

• Emergency preparedness

• Workforce development

I built a hybrid strategy anchored on:

• EPA’s Environmental and Climate Justice Block Grant Program

• DOE’s Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG)

• HHS’s Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) Expansion

• A pitch to The Kresge Foundation’s Climate Resilience Initiative

We also targeted state-level resilience grants and leveraged city sustainability funds for the local match.

My advice to Khalilah and team? “Don’t pitch this as charity. Pitch it as infrastructure meets public health meets justice. This isn’t a band-aid. It’s the new utility.”

Crafting the Winning Application

The story had to be airtight.

We opened with stark GIS maps: heat islands overlaid with mortality data. Phoenix Oasis’ proposed sites sat dead center in the most at-risk zones—where tree canopy was under 5%, household A/C penetration was below 40%, and heat-related 911 calls were rising year over year.

We built a detailed model: Phase One would retrofit six buildings (a church, a rec center, two libraries, and two public schools) into resilient cooling hubs, each serving 2,500–4,000 residents within walking or biking range. We projected a 35% drop in heat-related emergency visits across those neighborhoods within two years.

But we didn’t stop at numbers.

We included letters from residents who’d survived blackouts, videos of kids sweating through summer school in uncooled classrooms, and even a poem written by a 10-year-old about “shade you can trust.”

We showed funders this wasn’t just about keeping people alive. It was about dignity, community, and a future where the climate crisis didn’t mean a death sentence for the poor.

We hit “submit” just before a record-breaking 117°F heat wave rolled in.

The Approval & Aftermath

The news came not in one burst, but a wave.

• EPA’s Justice40 fund awarded $3.8 million, citing the project’s “integrated equity and infrastructure model.”

• DOE came in with $2.1 million for energy upgrades.

• HHS unlocked an additional $1.3 million in LIHEAP resilience enhancements.

• Kresge wrote a check for $750,000 to fund workforce training for community climate stewards.

Total package: $8.7 million and counting.

Within six months, construction had begun. By the following summer, three centers were open, staffed, and serving thousands.

During the next major heat wave, a grandmother named Leticia walked into one of the new centers with her granddaughter. “Last year, we just prayed,” she said. “This year, we have a place.”

That’s what you call impact.

And other cities were watching. Albuquerque, Fresno, El Paso, and even Atlanta started calling Phoenix Oasis to replicate the model. A new playbook was born—one written in sweat, strategy, and shared resilience.

Grant Money Takeaways

Every win has its wisdom. Here’s what this Phoenix success taught me:

1. Heat is the new public health frontier.
   Treat it like emergency infrastructure—not a seasonal nuisance.

2. Place matters.
   The centers weren’t “somewhere downtown.” They were embedded in high-need neighborhoods. Funders noticed.

3. Don’t chase grants—build themes.
   This project hit five buckets: climate, health, equity, infrastructure, and jobs. That’s how you stack dollars.

4. Use emotion, not just evidence.
   GIS maps are good. A child’s poem about burning feet on playground asphalt? That’s unforgettable.

5. Community-led = credibility.
   The fact that this came from within—nurses, residents, churches—made all the difference.

What About Your City?

Somewhere, someone’s sweating through a crisis that could be solved with the right funding, the right partners, and the right strategy.

So here’s my challenge: What’s your city’s climate gap? Where does the next oasis need to rise?

You bring the dream. I’ll bring the framework.

Until next time,
– Mr. Grant Money

🛍 Explore More

• Dive into more stories on the Mr. Grant Money Blog

• Support the movement at the Mr. Grant Money Store

• Listen to Mr. Grant Money Music for socially-driven soundtracks

💬 Discussion Questions

1. In a world of rising temperatures, what should cities treat as essential infrastructure: cooling centers, green roofs, tree canopies—or something else?

2. Do you know a neighborhood that experiences more extreme heat than others? Why do you think that is—and what could be done about it?

3. What role should community members play in the design of climate resilience solutions? Can “top-down” approaches ever be enough?

4. Have you or someone you know ever been affected by extreme heat? What resources or support would have made a difference?

5. If your city received $9 million tomorrow to combat climate heat, what would you fund first—and how would you make the case to grantmakers?